tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103089.post116542263926775396..comments2009-07-11T06:32:15.856-06:00John Doenoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103089.post-1167366742969979772006-12-28T22:32:00.000-06:002006-12-28T22:32:00.000-06:00I think the ban on "drugs" is horribly vague and a methedalogically poor assessment of the situation.<BR/><BR/>I think some drugs (e.g. marijuana) should likely be legalized, and others (e.g. lsd) should.<BR/><BR/>As to the "destroying lives" point, if you're not addcited yet, you're much more likely to be so if it costs $95 bucks less in the first place. I think it probably cancels out.Willnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103089.post-1167333362373622202006-12-28T13:16:00.000-06:002006-12-28T13:16:00.000-06:00Awesome! Feel free to use any of the points. :DShaun R. Connellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12352645704032915190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24103089.post-1167282600657685392006-12-27T23:10:00.000-06:002006-12-27T23:10:00.000-06:00Great points! (I may be "stealing" some of your reasoning to use in a discussion on a proposed smoking ban) :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com